Article in HTML

Author(s): Devshree Verma, Meena Sahu, K.K. Harris

Email(s): harris@dbgirls.org

Address:

    Gurukul Mahila Mahavidyalaya, Kalabari Raipur (C.G) Govt. Higher Secondary School, Fundhar, Raipur (C.G) Department of Zoology Govt. D.B. Girls P.G. College, Raipur (C.G)

Published In:   Volume - 5,      Issue - 3,     Year - 2025


Cite this article:
Devshree Verma, Meena Sahu, K.K. Harris (2025), Phytochemical characterisation of two plants with antisickling properties: Azadirachta indica A Juss and Helianthus annuus L.. Spectrum of Emerging Sciences, 5 (3) 7-12.

  View PDF

Please allow Pop-Up for this website to view PDF file.



1.       Introduction

Plants containing bioactive phytochemicals have long been recognised as medicinal plants [1]. Their therapeutic properties are attributed to the occurrence of phytochemicals in different plant parts such as leaves, stems, and roots [2]. The phytochemicals in the different parts of plants often varies significantly between different plant organs, which explains why traditional healers selectively used specific parts of a plant as a cure for ailments [3]. This practice emphasizes the importance of understanding both the type and distribution of phytochemicals within plants to fully harness their medicinal potential [4].Phytochemicals extracted from plants have demonstrated a wide range of therapeutic properties and have historically been applied in traditional medicine [5]. In the present study, the antisickling activities of Azadirachta indica A. Juss. and Helianthus annuus L. were evaluated through both qualitative and quantitative phytochemical analyses. Comparative research indicates that the phytochemical profile of medicinal plants plays a central role in their antisickling activity [6]. Accordingly, plants containing such bioactive compounds have been classified as medicinal due to their capacity to prevent or treat specific diseases [7]. Their therapeutic efficacy depends on the presence and concentration of these phytochemicals within distinct plant parts; thus, the rational selection of the appropriate plant organ has been a common practice in traditional medicine [8].Medicinal plants remain a vital source of therapeutic agents, largely due to their diverse phytochemical profiles. Among these, Azadirachta indica (neem) and Helianthus annuus (sunflower) have been the focus of recent scientific interest, particularly within Indian research communities, owing to their rich bioactive content and traditional use.

2.       Literature Review

Azadirachta indica (commonly known as neem) has been extensively investigated for its diverse array of bioactive compounds. Among these, limonoids such as nimbolide, azadirachtin, and gedunin have been shown to exhibit potent anticancer, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory effects by targeting key oncogenic and inflammatory signalling pathways [9]. Recent reviews have confirmed the presence of phytochemicals such as nimbidin, nimbin, nimbolinin, salannin, quercetin, and azadirachtin across neem’s leaves, bark, and roots, consolidating its pharmacological breadth [10]. Phytochemical screening of neem leaves has identified alkaloids, cardiac glycosides, saponins, phenols, flavonoids, and terpenoids—compounds traditionally recognised for their medicinal relevance [11]. More recently, computational modelling techniques, particularly those utilising topological indices and molecular docking, have begun to prioritise neem compounds for therapeutic exploration, thereby illustrating the growing integration of computational pharmacognosy in modern drug discovery [12, 17]. Additional reports have highlighted neem’s antimicrobial, hepatoprotective, and neuroprotective activities, thereby broadening the therapeutic spectrum associated with its phytoconstituents [18].

Helianthus annuus (sunflower) also displays a complex phytochemical profile, with both nutritional and medicinal value. A comprehensive 2024 phytochemical investigation quantified the presence of flavonoids, alkaloids, saponins, tannins, triterpenoids, glycosides, phenols, coumarins, steroids, and phytosterols in sunflower petals, with extracts exhibiting alkaloid concentrations up to 650 mg/g and flavonoid concentrations up to 300 mg/g [13]. In addition, sunflower crop residues were found to contain tannins, flavonoids, terpenes, saponins, alkaloids, and steroids, all of which are associated with antioxidant, antimicrobial, antitumour, and hypoglycaemic activities [14]. Previous investigations conducted between 2016–2017 have similarly emphasised the presence of phenolic acids, flavonoids, and tocopherols in sunflower seeds and sprouts, reinforcing their antioxidant and cardioprotective properties [15]. Furthermore, recent pharmacological reports have demonstrated significant antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of H. annuus leaf extracts, thereby corroborating its role as a natural therapeutic agent [16-19]. Sunflower-derived phytosterols have also been associated with hypocholesterolaemia activity, adding to its harmacological relevance [20]. Although direct evidence of antisickling activity from Azadirachta indica or Helianthus annuus is not yet documented in the literature, their phytochemical profiles provide a compelling scientific basis for further exploration. The limonoids of A. indica may interact with erythrocyte membrane proteins, potentially enhancing membrane stability and reducing haemolysis. Meanwhile, the rich antioxidant composition of H. annuus—particularly flavonoids, phenolic acids, and tocopherols—could counteract oxidative stress, a key contributor to erythrocyte sickling in sickle cell disease [21]. Importantly, oxidative stress has been directly linked to increased polymerisation of sickle haemoglobin (HbS) and consequent red cell deformation, suggesting that natural antioxidants may play a critical role in mitigating this process [22]. The limonoid-rich profile of A. indica and the diverse antioxidant phytochemicals present in H. annuus strongly suggest compelling biochemical grounds for antisickling research. Future investigations should therefore focus on targeted antisickling bioassays, isolation of active principles, in vitro and in vivo mechanistic studies, and structure–activity relationship (SAR) analysis to identify lead compounds. Such efforts may ultimately illuminate novel therapeutic avenues for the management of sickle cell disease, while also contributing to the broader field of plant-derived drug discovery [23].

 3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Collection of Plant Samples

Fresh leaves, stems, and seeds of Azadirachta indica A. Juss. and Helianthus annuus L. were collected from both cultivated farms and open fields in the districts of Raipur and Mahasamund. The plant materials were properly identified and authenticated before carrying out the phytochemical analysis. The collected leaves, stems, and seeds were cut into small pieces and air-dried in the shade for two weeks. Once dried, they were ground to a fine powder (1 mm particle size) using a grinder, and then subjected to phytochemical screening.

3.2 Preparation of Extracts

Four solvents of increasing polarity were used for extraction: ethanol, methanol, chloroform, and petroleum ether. Thirty grams of powdered seeds, leaves and stems of Azadirachta indica A. Juss. and Helianthus annuus L. were extracted with each solvent separately using a Soxhlet apparatus (250 ml) for 48 hours. The extracts were then concentrated by slow evaporation [24]. The resulting crude extracts were stored in closed containers for preliminary qualitative phytochemical analysis.

3.3  Phytochemical Screening

The extracts of each plant part were subjected to standard phytochemical tests to identify the constituents. The procedures described by Trease and Evans (1989) and Sofowora (1993) were followed. The presence of saponins, tannins, reducing sugars, alkaloids, terpenoids, flavonoids, cardiac glycosides, and anthraquinones was assessed using established methods [25, 27]. Quantitative estimation of phytochemicals (alkaloids, saponins, flavonoids, phenols, and tannins) was performed using standard methods [28–33].

4.       Result and Discussion

A.     Qualitative Phytochemical Analysis

II Qualitative phytochemical analysis of Azadirachta indica A. Juss-Qualitative phytochemical analysis of Azadirachta indica A. JUSS., regardless of the type of extract employed, found tannins, alkaloids, phenols, terpenoids, flavonoids and reducing sugars in all the components studied viz., leaves, fruits and stems; while saponins were present in the leaves and fruits; cardiac glycosides and anthraquinones in the stems (Table 1).

 

Qualitative phytochemical analysis of Helianthus annus LIN- In the other plant, Helianthus annus L., the study found flavonoids, alkaloids, phenols and reducing sugars in all the components viz., leaves, stems and seeds, while saponins are present in the leaves and seeds; and anthraquinones were only present in the seeds (Table 2).

 

B. Quantitative Phytochemical Analysis

I.                       Quantitative phytochemical analysis of Azadirachta indica A. JUSS-

 

The quantitative phytochemical analysis of Azadirachta indica A. Juss. revealed notable variations in the distribution of secondary metabolites across different plant parts. In the leaves, flavonoids were found in the highest proportion (10.1%), followed by phenols (5.2%), alkaloids (3.7%), saponins (2.6%), and tannins (1.18%).

Table 1: Phytochemical constituents of different extracts of the leaves, fruits and stems of Azadirachta indica A. Juss

Components

Ethanolic#*

Methanolic

Chloroform

Petroleum ether

1*1

2

33

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

Tannins

+

-

+

+

+

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

Alkaloids

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

-

-

+

-

Reducing sugars

+

+

+

+

+

+

++

++

+

-

+

-

Saponins

+

-

+

+

-

+

+

-

+

+

-

-

Terpenoids

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

Flavonoids

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

C glycosides

-

-

+

-

-

-

-

-

+

-

-

+

Anthraquinone

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

+

-

+

-

Phenols

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

-

-

+

-

-

 

 

# EXTRACTS; * 1-Leaf 2-Fruit 3-Stem; + (Positive); - (Negative)

Table 2: Phytochemical constituents of different extracts of the leaves, fruits and stems of Helianthus annuus L.

  Components

Ethanolic *

Methanolic

Chloroform

Petroleum ether

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

Tannins

+

-

+

+

+

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

Alkaloids

+

+

+

+

+

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

Reducing sugars

+

+

+

+

-

+

+

-

+

-

-

-

Saponins

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

-

+

-

-

Terpenoids

-

-

+

-

-

+

-

-

+

-

+

+

Flavonoids

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

-

-

+

+

C glycosides

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Anthraquinone

-

+

-

-

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Phenols

+

+

+

+

+

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

 

# EXTRACTS; *1-Leaf 2-Fruit 3-Stem; + (Positive); - (Negative)

The fruits showed a markedly higher concentration of flavonoids (20.1%) and alkaloids (8.1%), while phenols (4.4%), saponins (4.1%), and tannins (0.45%) were present in comparatively lower amounts. Flavonoids and phenols constituted the predominant phytochemicals, with fruits showing the richest flavonoid content, while stems were particularly rich in phenols (Table 3).

In the stems, phenols were the most abundant (7.1%), followed flavonoids (4.9%), alkaloids (1.4%), saponins (1.6%), and tannins (0.53%).

Table 3: Quantitative phytochemical estimation of Azadirachta indica A. Juss results are given as percentage.

Constituents

Alkaloids

Phenols

Flavonoids

Saponins

Tannins

Tannins

3.7

5.2

10.1

2.6

1.18

Alkaloids

8.1

4.4

20.1

4.1

0.45

Reducing sugars

1.4

7.1

4.9

1.6

0.53

 

II.                 Quantitative phytochemical analysis of Helianthus annus L

The quantitative phytochemical analysis of Helianthus annuus L. demonstrated distinct differences in secondary metabolite content across the leaves, seeds, and stems. In the leaves, alkaloids were the most abundant (5.7%), followed by phenols (4.59%), flavonoids (2.92%), saponins (2.85%), and tannins (0.62%). The seeds contained the highest concentration of alkaloids (14%) and notable amounts of flavonoids (5.35%) and saponins (4.18%). Phenols (3.16%) and tannins (0.42%) were comparatively lower. In the stems, the dominant compounds were alkaloids (4.3%), flavonoids (3.96%), and phenols (3.52%), while saponins and tannins were negligible or absent. Seeds exhibited the richest phytochemical profile, particularly in alkaloids, while leaves showed a more balanced distribution of metabolites, and stems presented moderate levels of alkaloids, phenols, and flavonoids (Table 4).

Table 4: Quantitative phytochemical estimation of Helianthus annuus L results are given as percentage.

 

Constituents

Alkaloids

Phenols

Flavonoids

Saponins

Tannins

Tannins

5.7

4.59

2.92

2.85

0.62

Alkaloids

14

3.16

5.35

4.18

0.42

Reducing sugars

4.3

3.52

3.96

7.74

0.13

 

 

5. Conclution:

The antisickling activities of Azadirachta indica and Helianthus annuus were examined using analytical methods involving of phytochemical evaluations of these plants. The antisickling effects recorded at different concentrations of extracts from leaves, stems, fruits, and seeds were directly related to their phytochemical contents. Screening showed a relatively higher presence of phenols, flavonoids, saponins, and alkaloids in many parts, while tannins, glycosides, and reducing sugars occurred in moderate quantities. These observations agree with earlier reports which highlighted the importance of secondary metabolites in exerting several biological activities, especially antioxidant, antimicrobial, and antisickling effects.

Phytochemical profiles of Azadirachta indica and Helianthus annuus showed both similarities and distinct differences in the distribution of metabolites across their plant parts. In A. indica, flavonoids and phenols were consistently predominant. Fruits were richest in flavonoids (20.1%), making them the most concentrated source. Leaves also showed appreciable flavonoids (10.1%) and phenols (5.2%), while stems recorded lower flavonoids (4.9%) but higher phenols (7.1%). Tannins, alkaloids, and saponins were observed in moderate or low proportions, with fruits showing the maximum alkaloid concentration (8.1%). H. annuus was notable for much higher alkaloid content, particularly in seeds (14%), which was substantially greater than in A. indica. Alkaloids (5.7%) were moderately present, while stems had 4.3%. Flavonoids in H. annuus were less prominent, with the highest value seen in seeds (5.35%). Phenols were between 3–4% across plant parts, while saponins and tannins remained relatively minor, though seeds contained slightly more saponins (4.18%). A. indica is clearly distinguished by its flavonoid richness, particularly in fruits, which points to stronger antioxidant potential linked with these compounds. In contrast, H. annuus is remarkable for its high alkaloid content, especially in seeds, which may be responsible for several pharmacological effects including antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties. Phenolic levels were fairly distributed in both plants, though leaves and stems of A. indica had somewhat higher values than those of H. annuus.Although both plants contain bioactive phytochemicals relevant to antisickling and other therapeutic applications, their profiles complement each other: A. indica is flavonoid- and phenol-rich, while H. annuus is mainly alkaloid-rich. This contrast strengthens the importance of assessing different plant parts for specific medicinal purposes.Several studies have shown that phytochemicals play a crucial role in preserving erythrocyte membrane stability and lowering oxidative stress, both of which are vital for reducing the sickling process [38,39]. Flavonoids and phenols are especially reported to stabilise red blood cell membranes and prevent haemoglobin S polymerisation, thereby supporting normal cell shape under low oxygen [40]. Alkaloids are known to associate with haemoglobin molecules to delay or reduce sickling [41]. Likewise, saponins protect membranes, while tannins enhance antioxidant functions synergistically [42]. Azadirachta indica has long been employed in traditional medicine for a range of pharmacological effects, including antimalarial, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory activities [43,44]. Recent findings confirm that its extracts show strong antioxidant activity, which may contribute to protecting erythrocytes from oxidative stress [45]. Similarly, Helianthus annuus (sunflower), grown widely for edible oil, is rich in bio-active compounds such as caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, and flavonoids, which together provide significant antisickling, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects [46,47]. These properties can aid in reducing erythrocyte sickling by stabilising membranes and scavenging harmful free radicals. The identification of novel medicinal plants is essential for progress in drug discovery. With its enormous plant diversity, India represents a valuable reservoir of ethnomedicinal resources that remain underexplored. Worldwide, several studies have already reported effective antisickling properties in plants such as Cajanus cajan, Carica papaya, and Zanthoxylum zanthoxyloides, supporting the view that phytochemicals can serve as complementary or alternative therapies in the managing sickle cell anaemia. In this framework, we conducted this study to validate the antisickling potentials of these both plants on human erythrocytes. The results demonstrate that both plants can be considered valuable sources for medicinal applications. This work reinforces the importance of studying and utilising plant-based resources for drug discovery and development. However, detailed bioassay-guided isolation of active constituents, along with molecular investigations, will be required to establish the mechanisms of action and to translate these preliminary findings into clinical practice.


Related Images:

Recomonded Articles:

Author(s): Samrat Paudel; Rekina Shrestha; Pramod Poudel; Rameshwar Adhikari

DOI: 10.55878/SES2022-2-1-1         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Madhav Kapoor

DOI: 10.55878/SES2023-3-2-5         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Manish Kumar; Keshav Shishodiya; Yogendra Singh Rajawat; Seema Nayak

DOI: 10.55878/SES2023-3-1-6         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Binod Shrestha; Sambridhi Shah; Khagendra Chapain; Rajendra Joshi; Rajesh Pandit

DOI: 10.55878/SES2022-2-1-7         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Sangita Gawde; Pragya Kulkarni

DOI: 10.55878/SES2024-4-2-8         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Parag Jain; Puneet Pal Singh

DOI: 10.55878/SES2021-1-1-1         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Sushant Bindra; Mehak Piplani

DOI: 10.55878/SES2021-1-1-2         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Bhupendra Kande; Prachi Parmar

DOI: 10.55878/SES2022-2-1-3         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Reena Rawat

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Sandhya Bhardwaj; Abhishek Kumar Singh; Ashish Kumar Jha; Aman Kumar

DOI: 10.55878/SES2023-3-1-10         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Ankita Deshlahre; Pragya Kulkarni

DOI: 10.55878/SES2024-4-2-9         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Karan Kumar Giri; Abhishek Singh; Mohammad Intiyaj Alam; Basanta Mahato

DOI: 10.55878/SES2023-3-1-8         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Umika Verma

DOI: 10.55878/SES2024-4-1-16         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Ruchi Sharma

DOI: 10.55878/SES2022-2-1-5         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Roli Jain

DOI: 10.55878/SES2022-2-1-6         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Chaman Soni; Surendra Gupta; Himanshu Ranjan

DOI: 10.55878/SES2023-3-1-5         Access: Open Access Read More