1. Introduction
Plants containing bioactive phytochemicals have long
been recognised as medicinal plants [1]. Their therapeutic properties are
attributed to the occurrence of phytochemicals in different plant parts such as
leaves, stems, and roots [2]. The phytochemicals in the different parts of
plants often varies significantly between different plant organs, which
explains why traditional healers selectively used specific parts of a plant as
a cure for ailments [3]. This practice emphasizes the importance of understanding
both the type and distribution of phytochemicals within plants to fully harness
their medicinal potential [4].Phytochemicals extracted from plants have
demonstrated a wide range of therapeutic properties and have historically been
applied in traditional medicine [5]. In the present study, the antisickling
activities of Azadirachta indica A. Juss. and Helianthus annuus
L. were evaluated through both qualitative and quantitative phytochemical
analyses. Comparative research indicates that the phytochemical profile of
medicinal plants plays a central role in their antisickling activity [6].
Accordingly, plants containing such bioactive compounds have been classified as
medicinal due to their capacity to prevent or treat specific diseases [7].
Their therapeutic efficacy depends on the presence and concentration of these
phytochemicals within distinct plant parts; thus, the rational selection of the
appropriate plant organ has been a common practice in traditional medicine
[8].Medicinal plants remain a vital source of therapeutic agents, largely due
to their diverse phytochemical profiles. Among these, Azadirachta indica
(neem) and Helianthus annuus (sunflower) have been the focus of recent
scientific interest, particularly within Indian research communities, owing to
their rich bioactive content and traditional use.
2.
Literature Review
Azadirachta indica (commonly known as neem) has been
extensively investigated for its diverse array of bioactive compounds. Among
these, limonoids such as nimbolide, azadirachtin, and gedunin have been shown
to exhibit potent anticancer, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory effects
by targeting key oncogenic and inflammatory signalling pathways [9]. Recent
reviews have confirmed the presence of phytochemicals such as nimbidin, nimbin,
nimbolinin, salannin, quercetin, and azadirachtin across neem’s leaves, bark,
and roots, consolidating its pharmacological breadth [10]. Phytochemical
screening of neem leaves has identified alkaloids, cardiac glycosides,
saponins, phenols, flavonoids, and terpenoids—compounds traditionally
recognised for their medicinal relevance [11]. More recently, computational
modelling techniques, particularly those utilising topological indices and
molecular docking, have begun to prioritise neem compounds for therapeutic
exploration, thereby illustrating the growing integration of computational
pharmacognosy in modern drug discovery [12, 17]. Additional reports have
highlighted neem’s antimicrobial, hepatoprotective, and neuroprotective
activities, thereby broadening the therapeutic spectrum associated with its
phytoconstituents [18].
Helianthus annuus (sunflower) also displays a complex
phytochemical profile, with both nutritional and medicinal value. A
comprehensive 2024 phytochemical investigation quantified the presence of
flavonoids, alkaloids, saponins, tannins, triterpenoids, glycosides, phenols,
coumarins, steroids, and phytosterols in sunflower petals, with extracts
exhibiting alkaloid concentrations up to 650 mg/g and flavonoid concentrations
up to 300 mg/g [13]. In addition, sunflower crop residues were found to contain
tannins, flavonoids, terpenes, saponins, alkaloids, and steroids, all of which
are associated with antioxidant, antimicrobial, antitumour, and hypoglycaemic
activities [14]. Previous investigations conducted between 2016–2017 have
similarly emphasised the presence of phenolic acids, flavonoids, and
tocopherols in sunflower seeds and sprouts, reinforcing their antioxidant and
cardioprotective properties [15]. Furthermore, recent pharmacological reports
have demonstrated significant antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of H.
annuus leaf extracts, thereby corroborating its role as a natural
therapeutic agent [16-19]. Sunflower-derived phytosterols have also been
associated with hypocholesterolaemia activity, adding to its harmacological
relevance [20]. Although direct evidence of antisickling activity from Azadirachta
indica or Helianthus annuus is not yet documented in the literature,
their phytochemical profiles provide a compelling scientific basis for further
exploration. The limonoids of A. indica may interact with erythrocyte
membrane proteins, potentially enhancing membrane stability and reducing
haemolysis. Meanwhile, the rich antioxidant composition of H. annuus—particularly
flavonoids, phenolic acids, and tocopherols—could counteract oxidative stress,
a key contributor to erythrocyte sickling in sickle cell disease [21].
Importantly, oxidative stress has been directly linked to increased
polymerisation of sickle haemoglobin (HbS) and consequent red cell deformation,
suggesting that natural antioxidants may play a critical role in mitigating
this process [22]. The limonoid-rich profile of A. indica and the
diverse antioxidant phytochemicals present in H. annuus strongly suggest
compelling biochemical grounds for antisickling research. Future investigations
should therefore focus on targeted antisickling bioassays, isolation of active
principles, in vitro and in vivo mechanistic studies, and structure–activity
relationship (SAR) analysis to identify lead compounds. Such efforts may
ultimately illuminate novel therapeutic avenues for the management of sickle
cell disease, while also contributing to the broader field of plant-derived
drug discovery [23].
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Collection of Plant Samples
Fresh
leaves, stems, and seeds of Azadirachta indica A. Juss. and Helianthus annuus L. were collected from both
cultivated farms and open fields in the districts of Raipur and Mahasamund. The
plant materials were properly identified and authenticated before carrying out
the phytochemical analysis. The collected leaves, stems, and seeds were cut
into small pieces and air-dried in the shade for two weeks. Once dried, they
were ground to a fine powder (1 mm particle size) using a grinder, and then
subjected to phytochemical screening.
3.2 Preparation
of Extracts
Four solvents of
increasing polarity were used for extraction: ethanol, methanol, chloroform,
and petroleum ether. Thirty grams of powdered seeds, leaves and stems of Azadirachta
indica A. Juss. and Helianthus annuus L. were extracted with each
solvent separately using a Soxhlet apparatus (250 ml) for 48 hours. The
extracts were then concentrated by slow evaporation [24]. The resulting crude
extracts were stored in closed containers for preliminary qualitative
phytochemical analysis.
3.3 Phytochemical Screening
The extracts of each
plant part were subjected to standard phytochemical tests to identify the
constituents. The procedures described by Trease and Evans (1989) and Sofowora
(1993) were followed. The presence of saponins, tannins, reducing sugars,
alkaloids, terpenoids, flavonoids, cardiac glycosides, and anthraquinones was
assessed using established methods [25, 27]. Quantitative estimation of phytochemicals
(alkaloids, saponins, flavonoids, phenols, and tannins) was performed using
standard methods [28–33].
4.
Result and Discussion
A.
Qualitative Phytochemical Analysis
II
Qualitative phytochemical analysis of Azadirachta indica A. Juss-Qualitative
phytochemical analysis of Azadirachta indica A. JUSS., regardless of the
type of extract employed, found tannins, alkaloids, phenols, terpenoids,
flavonoids and reducing sugars in all the components studied viz., leaves,
fruits and stems; while saponins were present in the leaves and fruits; cardiac
glycosides and anthraquinones in the stems (Table 1).
Qualitative phytochemical analysis of Helianthus annus
LIN- In the other plant, Helianthus annus L., the study found
flavonoids, alkaloids, phenols and reducing sugars in all the components viz.,
leaves, stems and seeds, while saponins are present in the leaves and seeds;
and anthraquinones were only present in the seeds (Table 2).
B.
Quantitative Phytochemical Analysis
I.
Quantitative phytochemical analysis of Azadirachta
indica A. JUSS-
The
quantitative phytochemical analysis of Azadirachta indica A. Juss.
revealed notable variations in the distribution of secondary metabolites across
different plant parts. In the leaves, flavonoids were found in the
highest proportion (10.1%), followed by phenols (5.2%), alkaloids (3.7%),
saponins (2.6%), and tannins (1.18%).
Table 1: Phytochemical
constituents of different extracts of the leaves, fruits and stems of Azadirachta
indica A. Juss
|
Components
|
Ethanolic#*
|
Methanolic
|
Chloroform
|
Petroleum ether
|
|
1*1
|
2
|
33
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
Tannins
|
+
|
-
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Alkaloids
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
-
|
-
|
+
|
-
|
|
Reducing sugars
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
++
|
++
|
+
|
-
|
+
|
-
|
|
Saponins
|
+
|
-
|
+
|
+
|
-
|
+
|
+
|
-
|
+
|
+
|
-
|
-
|
|
Terpenoids
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
|
Flavonoids
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
|
C glycosides
|
-
|
-
|
+
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
+
|
-
|
-
|
+
|
|
Anthraquinone
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
+
|
-
|
+
|
-
|
|
Phenols
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
-
|
-
|
+
|
-
|
-
|
# EXTRACTS;
* 1-Leaf 2-Fruit 3-Stem; + (Positive); - (Negative)
Table 2: Phytochemical
constituents of different extracts of the leaves, fruits and stems of Helianthus
annuus L.
|
Components
|
Ethanolic *
|
Methanolic
|
Chloroform
|
Petroleum ether
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
Tannins
|
+
|
-
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Alkaloids
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Reducing sugars
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
-
|
+
|
+
|
-
|
+
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Saponins
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
-
|
+
|
-
|
-
|
|
Terpenoids
|
-
|
-
|
+
|
-
|
-
|
+
|
-
|
-
|
+
|
-
|
+
|
+
|
|
Flavonoids
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
-
|
-
|
+
|
+
|
|
C glycosides
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Anthraquinone
|
-
|
+
|
-
|
-
|
+
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Phenols
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
# EXTRACTS;
*1-Leaf 2-Fruit 3-Stem; + (Positive); - (Negative)
The fruits showed a
markedly higher concentration of flavonoids (20.1%) and alkaloids (8.1%), while
phenols (4.4%), saponins (4.1%), and tannins (0.45%) were present in
comparatively lower amounts. Flavonoids
and phenols constituted the predominant phytochemicals, with fruits showing the
richest flavonoid content, while stems were particularly rich in phenols (Table 3).
In the stems, phenols
were the most abundant (7.1%), followed flavonoids (4.9%), alkaloids (1.4%),
saponins (1.6%), and tannins (0.53%).
Table 3: Quantitative phytochemical estimation of Azadirachta
indica A. Juss results are given as percentage.
|
Constituents
|
Alkaloids
|
Phenols
|
Flavonoids
|
Saponins
|
Tannins
|
|
Tannins
|
3.7
|
5.2
|
10.1
|
2.6
|
1.18
|
|
Alkaloids
|
8.1
|
4.4
|
20.1
|
4.1
|
0.45
|
|
Reducing sugars
|
1.4
|
7.1
|
4.9
|
1.6
|
0.53
|
II.
Quantitative phytochemical analysis of Helianthus
annus L
The quantitative phytochemical
analysis of Helianthus annuus L. demonstrated distinct differences in
secondary metabolite content across the leaves, seeds, and stems. In the leaves, alkaloids were the most
abundant (5.7%), followed by phenols (4.59%), flavonoids (2.92%), saponins
(2.85%), and tannins (0.62%). The seeds
contained the highest concentration of alkaloids (14%) and notable amounts of
flavonoids (5.35%) and saponins (4.18%). Phenols (3.16%) and tannins (0.42%)
were comparatively lower. In the stems,
the dominant compounds were alkaloids (4.3%), flavonoids (3.96%), and phenols
(3.52%), while saponins and tannins were negligible or absent. Seeds exhibited
the richest phytochemical profile, particularly in alkaloids, while leaves
showed a more balanced distribution of metabolites, and stems presented
moderate levels of alkaloids, phenols, and flavonoids (Table 4).
Table 4: Quantitative
phytochemical estimation of Helianthus annuus L results are given as
percentage.
|
Constituents
|
Alkaloids
|
Phenols
|
Flavonoids
|
Saponins
|
Tannins
|
|
Tannins
|
5.7
|
4.59
|
2.92
|
2.85
|
0.62
|
|
Alkaloids
|
14
|
3.16
|
5.35
|
4.18
|
0.42
|
|
Reducing sugars
|
4.3
|
3.52
|
3.96
|
7.74
|
0.13
|
5. Conclution:
The antisickling activities of Azadirachta indica
and Helianthus annuus were examined using analytical methods involving
of phytochemical evaluations of these plants. The antisickling effects recorded
at different concentrations of extracts from leaves, stems, fruits, and seeds
were directly related to their phytochemical contents. Screening showed a
relatively higher presence of phenols, flavonoids, saponins, and alkaloids in
many parts, while tannins, glycosides, and reducing sugars occurred in moderate
quantities. These observations agree with earlier reports which highlighted the
importance of secondary metabolites in exerting several biological activities,
especially antioxidant, antimicrobial, and antisickling effects.
Phytochemical
profiles of Azadirachta indica and Helianthus annuus showed both
similarities and distinct differences in the distribution of metabolites across
their plant parts. In A. indica, flavonoids and phenols were
consistently predominant. Fruits were richest in flavonoids (20.1%), making
them the most concentrated source. Leaves also showed appreciable flavonoids
(10.1%) and phenols (5.2%), while stems recorded lower flavonoids (4.9%) but
higher phenols (7.1%). Tannins, alkaloids, and saponins were observed in
moderate or low proportions, with fruits showing the maximum alkaloid
concentration (8.1%). H. annuus was notable for much higher alkaloid
content, particularly in seeds (14%), which was substantially greater than in A.
indica. Alkaloids (5.7%) were moderately present, while stems had 4.3%.
Flavonoids in H. annuus were less prominent, with the highest value seen
in seeds (5.35%). Phenols were between 3–4% across plant parts, while saponins
and tannins remained relatively minor, though seeds contained slightly more
saponins (4.18%). A. indica is clearly distinguished by its flavonoid
richness, particularly in fruits, which points to stronger antioxidant
potential linked with these compounds. In contrast, H. annuus is
remarkable for its high alkaloid content, especially in seeds, which may be
responsible for several pharmacological effects including antimicrobial and
anti-inflammatory properties. Phenolic levels were fairly distributed in both
plants, though leaves and stems of A. indica had somewhat higher values
than those of H. annuus.Although both plants contain bioactive phytochemicals
relevant to antisickling and other therapeutic applications, their profiles
complement each other: A. indica is flavonoid- and phenol-rich, while H.
annuus is mainly alkaloid-rich. This contrast strengthens the importance of
assessing different plant parts for specific medicinal purposes.Several studies
have shown that phytochemicals play a crucial role in preserving erythrocyte
membrane stability and lowering oxidative stress, both of which are vital for
reducing the sickling process [38,39]. Flavonoids and phenols are especially
reported to stabilise red blood cell membranes and prevent haemoglobin S
polymerisation, thereby supporting normal cell shape under low oxygen [40].
Alkaloids are known to associate with haemoglobin molecules to delay or reduce
sickling [41]. Likewise, saponins protect membranes, while tannins enhance
antioxidant functions synergistically [42]. Azadirachta indica has long
been employed in traditional medicine for a range of pharmacological effects,
including antimalarial, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory
activities [43,44]. Recent findings confirm that its extracts show strong
antioxidant activity, which may contribute to protecting erythrocytes from
oxidative stress [45]. Similarly, Helianthus annuus (sunflower), grown
widely for edible oil, is rich in bio-active compounds such as caffeic acid,
chlorogenic acid, and flavonoids, which together provide significant
antisickling, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects [46,47]. These
properties can aid in reducing erythrocyte sickling by stabilising membranes
and scavenging harmful free radicals. The identification of novel medicinal
plants is essential for progress in drug discovery. With its enormous plant
diversity, India represents a valuable reservoir of ethnomedicinal resources
that remain underexplored. Worldwide, several studies have already reported
effective antisickling properties in plants such as Cajanus cajan, Carica
papaya, and Zanthoxylum zanthoxyloides, supporting the view that
phytochemicals can serve as complementary or alternative therapies in the managing
sickle cell anaemia. In this framework, we conducted this study to validate the
antisickling potentials of these both plants on human erythrocytes. The results
demonstrate that both plants can be considered valuable sources for medicinal
applications. This work reinforces the importance of studying and utilising
plant-based resources for drug discovery and development. However, detailed
bioassay-guided isolation of active constituents, along with molecular
investigations, will be required to establish the mechanisms of action and to
translate these preliminary findings into clinical practice.